I really enjoyed the SAMR model when it was first discussed in class, and so it was great to have one of the groups present and elaborate on this topic. This model is a useful way to conceptualize the different ways and levels that teachers can utilize technology in their pedagogy, and as a reflective tool (ie teachers referring back to this model to see where each individual usage of technology is positioned) this can be a great way to reconsider how and (perhaps, more importantly) why we utilize technological resources and tools the way we do.

I find it interesting to frame this model in the same manner that discussions around music theory have been going on for years: prescriptivism vs. descriptivism. In this case, I feel that this model is more of a descriptivist approach, merely categorizing the ways that technology can be integrated and putting them into a hierarchy or linear path. However, I feel that if teachers see this from a prescriptivist lens this may lead to a false sense that the “R” should be what teachers always strive for, as rushing towards this final stage may lead to some details and considerations being missed. I think that thoughtful and intentional progression through this model is a useful endeavor and will ultimately lead to a greater and more effective integration of relevant technologies in our classroom.

Image retrieved from https://teachermade.com/samr-substitute-augment-modify-and-redefine-digital-worksheets-with-teachermade/