Free Inquiry Week 12: The End

We made it!

For this last inquiry post, I want to briefly reflect on what I have learned over the past 12 weeks. I spent quite a bit of time learning to fold various origami patterns, and I found this process enjoyable, but admittedly a bit frustrating at times as I sometimes lack the attention to detail to perfectly fold each step.

Here are some of the “highlights”:

One of the main goals of this was to try a variety of methods to learn patterns and I tried to use as many resources as possible. The main categories were website step-by-step tutorials, videos with audio instruction, and videos with no sound. I appreciate how the website tutorials can be done as fast or slow as you want, but sometimes they lack specific instructions. Videos with audio can be good, but often they can be too fast paced and need to be muted if put on a slower playback speed. Silent videos were probably my favorite, as I could play them at slower speeds and they generally took enough time to properly show exactly what they were doing, but the drawback is that if you look away from the video you may get lost momentarily. Overall, this was a fun and useful way for me to frame this inquiry, and I feel that I learned more about myself as a learner as well as encouraging me to think more deeply about the modes I am using when teaching.

I also learned more about the history, cultural relevance, and modern applications of origami. Tracing this art form over several hundred years, going through many eras, and ultimately becoming a popular art form across the world as well as inspiring technological innovations, has been very interesting. The story of Sadako and the 1000 cranes in particular has stuck with me as one of the more prominent examples of origami in popular culture (see my post on this topic: https://scottgordonblog.opened.ca/2023/11/15/free-inquiry-post-week-7/).

Well, that’s all from me. I still have at least 150 sheets of origami paper and I can imagine myself folding origami during times of stress or when I just need something fun to focus my energy on. Thanks for reading this blog!

Reflection Week 7

I was attending a conference during this class, but the criteria listed in the assignment description reminded me of a topic I spent a bit of time looking into earlier in the semester, namely tools for people with dyslexia. Of course, it is generally recommended that learners with dyslexia are given alternative ways to access, learn, and demonstrate their understanding of new information, and I believe all teachers should be amenable to this. This can include verbal submissions (like a podcast) rather than essays, allowing the use of text-to-speech, giving lessons both aurally and through text, and allowing learners more time to access information, in addition to many other suggestions. With that said, at times it is necessary to have a text-based component, and we can still make some accommodations to help these learners. I also believe that allowing students to build up their ability with the text-based modality, even if it is not a strength or is made more difficult due to disability, is still worthwhile.

Photo by Brett Jordan: https://www.pexels.com/photo/close-up-shot-of-text-on-a-book-5266319/

One of the main recommendations I have seen frequently is to use appropriate fonts and font sizes for anything requiring students to read. In general, sans serif fonts are considered preferable, but there are also fonts specifically designed for people with dyslexia. The built-in font for Google docs/slides/suite is the Lexend font, which I have started using more frequently when creating presentations (see here: https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Lexend). Other important factors regarding fonts is the size and spacing, both in terms of the space between letters and between lines. Being aware of the line spacing and kerning (the technical term for the spacing between letters) is important in order to make reading text easier for dyslexic learners.

From a UDL perspective, accommodations that help people with dyslexia can also benefit people without that condition in a variety of ways. From my perspective as a teacher, keeping dyslexic students in mind when creating my slide shows helps remind me to keep less text on each slide or spread it out more, which is good as I have a tendency to put too much info on every slide. From a learner’s perspective, have an easier-to-read document or slideshow is beneficial and can make the processing easier overall. The option to show learn and show learning through a variety of different modes is beneficial as well, as for example some students may excel with verbal communication but struggle to write.

I can’t say that I am an expert on this subject at all, but I am trying my best to learn from peers and through research how to cater to a variety of learners. If you have any suggestions or corrections for this post, please feel free to comment them here.

Free Inquiry Week 11: Origami & Technology

For decades, scientists have been utilizing concepts from origami in order to create more efficient ways to fold, store, and transport materials. This is especially relevant in the aerospace field, where most of the notable news stories involving origami and tech come from. The most notable recent example has been the StarShade, used to protect telescopes in space from damage (see article: https://eandt.theiet.org/2023/02/13/how-origami-inspires-world-changing-technology). Essentially, it is absurdly expensive and difficult to bring materials up into space, and everything needs to be as small as possible in order to fit into narrow and aerodynamic rockets. In this case, the design of the StarShade, like similar devices in the past, was heavily inspired by origami design. As stated in the article, “The ability to fold two-dimensional structures into complex, yet compact three-dimensional shapes is especially valuable to space sciences and missions,” and thus origami has been a frequent topic in this field.

The video below is a great introduction to the StarShade as well as showing how it unfolds once it has reached its destination.

Video: NASA. Retrieved from: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/videos/flower-power-starshade-unfurls-in-space

Week 8 Free Inquiry: Origami Design

In my week 6 reflection, I briefly discussed how origami designs are created and then narrowed in on a modern tech-based strategy for creating new designs. For this week, I decided to take a bit more time to research more traditional and tactile ways that new designs are created.

The best resource I found on this subject can be accessed at this link [ https://origami-resource-center.com/designing-origami/ ] and all of the following information is largely based on this article.

There are many ways to categorize origami design. To summarize, these are:

Creative Design/ “Doodling”: This refers to the process of creatively folding with no intention or target. Sometimes they may become abstract designs, though through trial-and-error they can also be altered to become more standard-looking designs.

Purposeful Design: People with a large base of knowledge and experience may be able to channel their ability towards creating a specific design they are intending to create. Often, these can be based on variations of pre-existing designs

Technical Design: This is a broad category, referring to a wide array of skills and techniques. Some examples listed in this article include Grafting (using more paper to expand upon a design) and Splitting (creating more intricate detail in a pre-existing design).

I found this research to be quite interesting, and I am curious about how origami enthusiasts feel about tech-based design compared to these more tactile or traditional ways of creating new designs. Is technology embraced or discouraged in this community? Are these tactile methods of creation through trial and error considered to be better or more respected? In some ways, this discussion reminds me of the conflict between musicians who compose on notation software vs using a keyboard – there is always conflict when new technologies streamline or fundamentally change the way art is created, but often the new technology or strategy will ultimately become accept or even prevail.

Free Inquiry Week 6 – Origami Design & Treemaker

Throughout this inquiry project, I have been curious about how these origami designs are created. From my understanding, the origins of the original or traditional patterns are largely lost, but they laid the foundation for future designs; these patterns often stem from one of several “bases” that generally originate from an earlier design. Presumably, more modern designs are largely based on trail-and-error and experimentation starting from one of these bases. 

With that said, I stumbled upon a program called “TreeMaker” that was created by Robert J. Lang to design origami (see article here: https://langorigami.com/article/treemaker/). Using a variety of complex mathematical processes and graph theory, this program set out to help create new origami fold patterns based on user input. It has gone through 5 iterations, most recently being updated in 2015, but was initially started in the 90s. 

Ideally I would spend some time trying this software, but frankly based on the screenshots and videos I’ve seen it seems far outside of my capabilities at this time. Here is a quick demonstration video from the channel Carlson Choo on YouTube:

Week 12 Reflection – SAMR

I really enjoyed the SAMR model when it was first discussed in class, and so it was great to have one of the groups present and elaborate on this topic. This model is a useful way to conceptualize the different ways and levels that teachers can utilize technology in their pedagogy, and as a reflective tool (ie teachers referring back to this model to see where each individual usage of technology is positioned) this can be a great way to reconsider how and (perhaps, more importantly) why we utilize technological resources and tools the way we do.

I find it interesting to frame this model in the same manner that discussions around music theory have been going on for years: prescriptivism vs. descriptivism. In this case, I feel that this model is more of a descriptivist approach, merely categorizing the ways that technology can be integrated and putting them into a hierarchy or linear path. However, I feel that if teachers see this from a prescriptivist lens this may lead to a false sense that the “R” should be what teachers always strive for, as rushing towards this final stage may lead to some details and considerations being missed. I think that thoughtful and intentional progression through this model is a useful endeavor and will ultimately lead to a greater and more effective integration of relevant technologies in our classroom.

Image retrieved from https://teachermade.com/samr-substitute-augment-modify-and-redefine-digital-worksheets-with-teachermade/

Assignment 2: Ed Tech Reflection

Note – Due to some WordPress difficulties, resources will be linked rather than embedded. 

Our presentation was on a resource called Semi-Conductor (https://semiconductor.withgoogle.com/), which is intended to simulate the experience of conducting a string orchestra by utilizing a body-mapping algorithm and a webcam. For an informational video, please follow this link: https://experiments.withgoogle.com/semi-conductor

If you would like to view our slides, here is the view-only URL for the Google slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1iL5TN6zSAVKJsAGQisFTCiz0TvMoa_m12Du1BujuESw/edit?usp=sharing

All facets of this reflection criteria are present in this slideshow: Our inquiry question, pros/cons, the relationship of our topic to learning and teaching in our subject areas, and how we would approach utilizing it in a music education setting.

Personal Reflection:

I thoroughly enjoyed working on this project with Meghan, Mike, Rhys, and Hayley. We had a good mix of music and non-music people, which made it easier for us to find issues with our resources in the particular use case we recommended for it (namely, people who are unfamiliar with conducting). The non-music specialists were fantastic and flexible with the subject matter, and were able to share a lot of useful and interesting perspectives on this resource. 

The most visually noticeable contribution I made to this assignment is the AI generated image on the title slide. It took me quite a long time to find the perfect prompt to generate an image I was looking for, and I think it worked well as a great attention-grabbing visual. I also assisted with the overall aesthetic, layout, and order of the slideshow. Aside from this, we worked collaboratively to discuss the pros and cons of this resource as well as how we would utilize it in our classes. Myself and the other music people spent a long time discussing the particular grades and classes this would work best for, as well as how we would introduce this tool, and I found that to be very useful in guiding our presentation as a whole. This was a brand new resource for me, and it helped me to broaden my horizons in regards to how technology can be integrated into the music classroom. Resources like Semi-Conductor can be a great way to allow students to try things they otherwise might not have a chance to try, and they can be fun and engaging activities for students as well. Though I’m still not certain I will use Semi-Conductor in my own classes (at least until some of the bugs are patched and new pieces are added, if that happens at all), it was an enjoyable process to take a deep dive into this resource. I look forward to finding more resources to add to my tool kit.

Week 5 Reflection – AI Image Creation

This week, I created a banner for the website using Microsoft Designer AI. It took me several iterations of the prompt to create this, but it worked out to something along the lines of “Brass trumpet in the style of origami, simple, yellow paper” with the specific dimensions which turned out to still not be compatible with my site. That said, it is still visible at the top of my site, albeit cropped depending on the browser and size of window. 

AI image creation has become remarkably useful for me in the past several weeks, and I seem to find new applications for it every time I use it. Most recently, I used this program to create the title graphic for the slideshow of my group project, as well as using it to create a visual to go along with a “holophrastic slogan” (a phrase that encapsulates a lot of meaning in few words) for another inquiry project. I have attached the image below here – it was also generated on Microsoft Designer. 

Though it takes a lot of practice to create the right prompts, these AI programs are a great way to ensure you can get the exact graphic you are looking for; alternatively, sometimes the images can be beyond what you could have possibly imagined, which can be a blessing and a curse.

Week 11 Reflection

The focus of our class this week was how to teach in an era where AI is widely available. Plagiarism and unethical use of AI is a common issue, and it can be difficult to detect and prove when students break these rules. AI-detection softwares are notoriously untrustworthy and create a large percentage of false positives, which negates the purpose and can potentially negatively impact students who did nothing wrong. Some of the solutions to this include allowing AI for beneficial purposes, making clear boundaries and guidelines, and trying to avoid the circumstances that cause students to want to cheat in the first place.

As a music teacher, I will primarily be teaching performance-focused classes, so plagiarism or unethical use of AI by students is somewhat irrelevant as there would be few instances to even attempt it. With that said, I am looking for ways to integrate other musical traditions and knowledge into the band classroom, some of which can not necessarily be taught through the medium of traditional band repertoire. I would be interested in finding ways to implement inquiry or research projects on a range of topics in my music classes, and those are where AI can pose a big issue. For inquiry-based learning, consistent check-ins and work blocks where I can actively see students working would be the main strategies I use to prevent these issues. I am also curious about the idea of a one-on-one interview with students as part of their project – by asking questions related to the subject that are not directly quoted in the (potentially AI-generated) essay or project, it should be easy to determine whether or not the student really spent time to research and understand the topic.

Free Inquiry Post – Week 7

For this blog post, I took some time to research one of the more famous historical events involving origami, namely the story of Sadako Sasaki and the one thousand cranes. The following is a ChatGPT-generated summary of her story:

Sadako Sasaki was a Japanese girl who survived the atomic bombing of Hiroshima in 1945 when she was two years old. In 1955, Sadako developed leukemia, which was believed to be a result of the radiation exposure from the bomb. While in the hospital, Sadako heard an old Japanese legend that if a person folded 1,000 origami cranes, they would be granted a wish.

Despite her deteriorating health, Sadako embarked on a mission to fold 1,000 paper cranes, with her wish being for good health and peace. She believed that by completing the cranes, she could overcome her illness. Sadly, Sadako passed away before she could finish, but her classmates and friends completed the remaining cranes in her honor.

The story of Sadako and the 1,000 cranes has become a powerful symbol of peace, hope, and the devastating impact of nuclear war. It has inspired people around the world to create paper cranes as a gesture of solidarity and a plea for a world without nuclear weapons. The Children’s Peace Monument in Hiroshima’s Peace Memorial Park stands in memory of Sadako and other child victims of the atomic bomb, and it is adorned with thousands of origami cranes sent from people worldwide. The legend of the 1,000 cranes continues to be a poignant reminder of the human cost of war and the importance of striving for peace.

For most westerners, the crane is by far the most famous origami figure, largely due to the story of Sadako. Many groups, schools, classes, and individuals continue to create cranes in her memory, often sending them to the Hiroshima Peace Memorial park (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiroshima_Peace_Memorial_Park).

Following this research, I took some time to reflect and fold my first origami crane, using a tutorial (https://origami.guide/origami-animals/origami-birds/traditional-origami-crane/) found online. I went through it quite quickly and made a few messy folds, but I figured it would be more authentic to post a picture of the first one I made rather than taking a few practice attempts first. Will I make 1000? No, probably not, but I have huge respect for those with the dedication to accomplish this feat, as well as those who fold cranes in memory of Sadako and the other victims of Hiroshima.

Overall, I have enjoyed learning more about the historical and cultural significance of origami throughout this inquiry project.

Photo: “No Crane No Gain”, Scott Gordon 2023

« Older posts

© 2025

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑